Security Devices/Cracking the Case - Revision history

Arcology Expert Program: Text replacement - " Test}}" to "}}"

2024-03-04T18:53:31Z

Text replacement - " Test}}" to "}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 4 March 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a {{Test\|Locksmith +		Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a {{Test\|Locksmith +
	Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn)		Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn)
	Extended ~~Test~~}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test.		Extended}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test.

	Whether or not physical violence (treat it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to {{wp\|fail-safe}}, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail-safe#Fail_safe_and_fail_secure fail-secure], destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach.		Whether or not physical violence (treat it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to {{wp\|fail-safe}}, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail-safe#Fail_safe_and_fail_secure fail-secure], destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach.

Arcology Expert Program at 02:38, 4 December 2023

2023-12-04T02:38:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 3 December 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Extended Test}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test.		Extended Test}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test.

	Whether or not physical violence (treat it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to {{wp\|fail-safe}}, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to fail-secure, destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach.		Whether or not physical violence (treat it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to {{wp\|fail-safe}}, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail-safe#Fail_safe_and_fail_secure fail-secure], destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach.

Arcology Expert Program at 19:57, 17 November 2022

2022-11-17T19:57:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 17 November 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Extended Test}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test.		Extended Test}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test.

	Whether or not physical violence (~~reat~~ it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to {{wp\|fail-safe}}, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to fail-secure, destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach.		Whether or not physical violence (treat it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to {{wp\|fail-safe}}, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to fail-secure, destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach.

Arcology Expert Program at 23:28, 10 November 2022

2022-11-10T23:28:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 10 November 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<noinclude>{{Stub\|~~Breaking & Entering~~}}</noinclude>		<noinclude>{{Stub\|Security Devices}}</noinclude>
	Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a {{Test\|Locksmith +		Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a {{Test\|Locksmith +
	Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn)		Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn)

Arcology Expert Program at 23:28, 10 November 2022

2022-11-10T23:28:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 10 November 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn)		Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn)
	Extended Test}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test.		Extended Test}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test.

	Some maglocks have anti-tamper systems. Identifying the presence of such a system requires a {{Test\|Locksmith + Intuition [Mental] (Anti-Tamper Rating) Test}}. Failing to identify the system means that an alarm is triggered when the character attempts to crack the case. If identified, add the Anti-Tamper Rating to the required threshold for the Extended Test.

	Whether or not physical violence (reat it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to {{wp\|fail-safe}}, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to fail-secure, destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach.		Whether or not physical violence (reat it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to {{wp\|fail-safe}}, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to fail-secure, destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach.

Arcology Expert Program: Arcology Expert Program moved page Breaking & Entering/Cracking the Case to Security Devices/Cracking the Case without leaving a redirect

2022-11-10T23:05:32Z

Arcology Expert Program moved page Breaking & Entering/Cracking the Case to Security Devices/Cracking the Case without leaving a redirect

← Older revision

Revision as of 19:05, 10 November 2022

Arcology Expert Program: Created page with "{{Stub|Breaking & Entering}} Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a {{Test|Locksmith + Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn) Extended Test}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test. Some maglocks have anti-tamper systems. Identifying the presence of such a system requires a {{Test|Locksmith + Intuition [Mental] (Anti-Tamper Rating) Test}}. Failing to identify the system means that an alarm..."

2022-11-10T21:41:39Z

Created page with "<noinclude>{{Stub|Breaking & Entering}}</noinclude> Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a {{Test|Locksmith + Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn) Extended Test}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test. Some maglocks have anti-tamper systems. Identifying the presence of such a system requires a {{Test|Locksmith + Intuition [Mental] (Anti-Tamper Rating) Test}}. Failing to identify the system means that an alarm..."

New page

<noinclude>{{Stub|Breaking & Entering}}</noinclude>
Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a {{Test|Locksmith +
Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn)
Extended Test}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test.

Some maglocks have anti-tamper systems. Identifying the presence of such a system requires a {{Test|Locksmith + Intuition [Mental] (Anti-Tamper Rating) Test}}. Failing to identify the system means that an alarm is triggered when the character attempts to crack the case. If identified, add the Anti-Tamper Rating to the required threshold for the Extended Test.

Whether or not physical violence (reat it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to {{wp|fail-safe}}, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to fail-secure, destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach.