(Created page with "<noinclude>{{Stub|Breaking & Entering}}</noinclude> Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a {{Test|Locksmith + Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn) Extended Test}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test. Some maglocks have anti-tamper systems. Identifying the presence of such a system requires a {{Test|Locksmith + Intuition [Mental] (Anti-Tamper Rating) Test}}. Failing to identify the system means that an alarm...") |
m (Text replacement - " Test}}" to "}}") |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Stub| | <noinclude>{{Stub|Security Devices}}</noinclude> | ||
Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a {{Test|Locksmith + | Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a {{Test|Locksmith + | ||
Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn) | Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn) | ||
Extended | Extended}}. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test. | ||
Whether or not physical violence (treat it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to {{wp|fail-safe}}, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail-safe#Fail_safe_and_fail_secure fail-secure], destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach. | |||
Whether or not physical violence ( | |||
Latest revision as of 14:53, 4 March 2024
This page is a Stub, meant to be transcluded into Security Devices rather than viewed directly.
Cracking a maglock's case to access the electronics requires a Locksmith + Agility [Physical] (Maglock Rating × 2, 1 Combat Turn) Extended Test. Reassembling the case afterwards requires the same test.
Whether or not physical violence (treat it as attempting to destroy a Barrier with Structure and Armor equal to the Maglock's Rating) is beneficial to bypassing a maglock depends on the site's security design. If the lock is designed to fail-safe, smashing it will in fact open whatever it is securing, but will also inform the security system of the breach. If the system is instead designed to fail-secure, destroying the lock will not open whatever it is securing... and it will still inform the security system of the breach.